Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2026
Effects of Oliceridine versus Sufentanil on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Compare the effects of oliceridine and sufentanil on reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Patients and Methods: In this single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted from June 2024 to March 2025, 176 female patients aged 18-75 years undergoing modified radical mastectomy were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either oliceridine (Group O) or sufentanil (Group S) during anesthesia induction. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV within 48 h postsurgery. Secondary outcomes included PONV severity, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores at rest and during activities, use of rescue antiemetics and rescue analgesia, cardiovascular adverse events after induction, changes in heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) around tracheal intubation, duration of anesthesia and surgery, and other drug-related adverse events after emergence. Results: Oliceridine significantly reduced the incidence of PONV within 48 h compared with sufentanil (20.5% vs 39.8%; p = 0.005). PONV severity at 48 h was also lower in the oliceridine group (median [IQR] 0.0 [0.0-0.0] vs 0.0 [0.0-5.0]; p = 0.016), and the incidence of PONV within 24 h was reduced (13.6% vs 27.3%; p = 0.025). Analgesic efficacy, as reflected by VAS scores and the need for rescue analgesia, was comparable between groups. Hemodynamic profiles and the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events were similar, although numerically fewer hypotensive and bradycardic episodes occurred with oliceridine. Conclusion: In patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy, oliceridine used for anesthetic induction and perioperative analgesia significantly reduced the incidence and severity of PONV compared with sufentanil, while maintaining adequate analgesia and a favorable safety profile. Oliceridine may represent a safer opioid option in breast cancer surgery, with a lower burden of opioid related adverse events (ORADEs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.