ReviewBMJ oncology2026
Foundation models in computational pathology: methods, applications and clinical implications.
Review in BMJ oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The digitisation of histopathology has accelerated the application of artificial intelligence (AI) to cancer diagnosis and precision oncology; however, most deployed AI systems remain narrowly task-specific and difficult to translate across diverse clinical environments. Pathology foundation AI models are emerging as a unifying paradigm, enabling the learning of generalisable representations of tissue morphology through large-scale pre-training and supporting a broad range of downstream tasks. In this narrative review, we examine the development, methodological foundations and current landscape of pathology foundation models in oncological pathology. We outline the evolution and principal trends in the field, classify the major model types and modalities and evaluate their capabilities and advantages in comparison with conventional pathology AI systems. We also examine the transition from foundation models to agentic AI systems and its implications for integrated, workflow-aware pathology practice. In addition, we review relevant regulatory and governance frameworks, with particular attention to requirements for validation, accountability, transparency and oversight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.