ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Self-Perceived Confidence and Clinical Preparedness in Restorative Dentistry Among Undergraduate Dental Students.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Key goals of undergraduate dental education include developing clinical confidence and preparing students for practice. This is particularly important in restorative dentistry when students transition from preclinical simulation to real clinical procedures. Assessing students' perceptions of their own confidence offers important information about the efficacy of competency-based courses and clinical training. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among undergraduate dental students. A standardized, self-administered questionnaire was used to measure students' confidence. It assessed confidence in basic restorative skills, cavity preparation, and performing restorations on different tooth types. It also evaluated confidence in managing various restorative indications. A five-point Likert scale was used to gauge confidence. Descriptive statistics were computed, and Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, and chi-square tests were used to compare academic levels and gender, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Students reported high confidence in basic restorative procedures, particularly Class I cavity preparation (mean score >4.4/5). Female students showed greater confidence in controlling tooth coloration (p = 0.048), while no significant gender differences were observed in most procedures (p > 0.05). Confidence was generally higher for anterior than posterior restorations. Sixth-year students demonstrated the highest confidence in radiograph taking (p = 0.043) and local anaesthetic administration (p = 0.017), reflecting increased confidence with academic progression. Confidence in restoring different teeth improved significantly between the fourth and sixth years (p < 0.001). Significant improvements were also observed in complex (p = 0.006) and indirect restorations (p = 0.014). Most students (88.9%) reported that completing more restorative cases increased their confidence. Conclusions: Self-perceived confidence in restorative dentistry increased with advancing academic level and clinical exposure. Lower confidence in posterior and complex restorations indicates the need for additional clinical experience. Enhanced simulation training and structured feedback may help ensure graduates develop competence, confidence, and readiness for independent practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.