ReviewCureus2026
Impact of Mobile Oral Health Applications on Pediatric Dental Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental anxiety (DA) in children remains a significant barrier to effective oral healthcare, often leading to treatment avoidance and poor outcomes. While traditional behavioral techniques such as Tell-Show-Do (TSD) and animated videos have been widely used, emerging digital interventions, particularly mobile oral health applications, offer novel, child-friendly approaches for anxiety reduction. Thus, the aim of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of mobile oral health applications in reducing DA among 4-11-year-olds, compared to other non-pharmacological behavioral management techniques. This review included 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1,002 children aged 4-11 years. Ten studies were eligible for meta-analysis. Information sources included PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, with the last search conducted on June 15, 2025. Interventions included mobile applications, maternal voice recordings, animated videos, and chairside techniques (TSD, TPD (Tell-Play-Do), Tell-Show-Play-Distraction (TSPD)). Primary outcomes were changes in validated anxiety scales; secondary outcomes included heart rate and oxygen saturation. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (ROB 2) tool for randomized trials and the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. A Bayesian hierarchical model was applied to rank interventions using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probabilities. Mobile applications significantly reduced anxiety scores and heart rate compared to the TSD and control groups. TSPD ranked highest for anxiety reduction (SUCRA: 99.53%), followed by maternal voice (66.34%) and mobile apps (60.23%). For heart rate reduction, maternal voice (83.24%) and mobile apps (76.5%) were most effective. Funnel plot asymmetry and Egger's test indicated potential publication bias. Mobile oral health applications, particularly when combined with maternal voice or presence, are effective and scalable complements to traditional behavioral techniques for managing pediatric DA. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution, as the network meta-analysis demonstrated moderate heterogeneity across included studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.