Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42116978›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.

Soufia El Ouardani, Hind Chibani, Farah El Ouardani, Sami Aziz Brahmi, Said Afqir

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Soufia El OuardaniMedical Oncology, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Oujda, MAR.
Hind ChibaniMedical Oncology, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Oujda, MAR.
Farah El OuardaniBiology, Multidisciplinary Faculty of Nador, Mohamed First University, Nador, MAR.
Sami Aziz BrahmiMedical Oncology, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Oujda, MAR.
Said AfqirMedical Oncology, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Oujda, MAR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly emerged as a transformative tool in modern medicine, particularly in oncology, where it has shown significant potential in improving diagnostic accuracy and early detection of cancer. Breast cancer remains one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide, and early diagnosis is crucial for reducing mortality. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current applications of AI in cancer diagnosis, with a specific focus on breast cancer. A narrative review of recent literature was conducted using major databases such as PubMed and Scopus, including studies on machine learning and deep learning techniques applied to imaging, histopathology, and clinical decision-making. AI-based models, particularly convolutional neural networks, have demonstrated high accuracy in analyzing mammographic images and detecting early-stage breast cancer, with some studies showing performance comparable to, or exceeding, that of experienced radiologists. Furthermore, AI has contributed to improved lesion classification, reduced false-positive rates, and enhanced diagnostic efficiency. In histopathology, AI systems have also shown strong capabilities in tumor detection and grading. Despite these promising advancements, several challenges remain, including data bias, lack of standardization, ethical concerns, and limited integration into clinical practice. Overall, AI represents a promising approach for improving breast cancer diagnosis, although further large-scale validation and clinical implementation are needed.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebreast cancerconvolutional neural networks (cnn)deep-learningmachine leaningrobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID42116978
PMCPMC13157640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.