Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42116977›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Survival and Quality of Life After Reirradiation With Concurrent Pemetrexed/Erlotinib Followed by Maintenance Erlotinib for Recurrent/Second Primary Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Final Report of a Phase I/II Trial.

Ryan T Hughes, Sydney Smith, D Neil Hayes, Bhishamjit Chera, Ralph B D'Agostino, Joshua D Waltonen, Christopher A Sullivan, James D Browne, Kathryn M Greven, Mercedes Porosnicu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ryan T HughesRadiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
Sydney SmithBiostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
D Neil HayesCenter for Cancer Research, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, USA.
Bhishamjit CheraRadiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Ralph B D'AgostinoBiostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
Joshua D WaltonenOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
Christopher A SullivanOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
James D BrowneOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
Kathryn M GrevenRadiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
Mercedes PorosnicuCancer Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction For patients with recurrent/second primary (R/SP) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) within a previously irradiated volume that is not amenable to surgical resection, reirradiation may be employed with curative intent. The optimal regimen for concurrent chemotherapy with reirradiation has not been determined. We sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of concurrent erlotinib in patients treated with definitive reirradiation, to determine disease response, PFS, and OS in patients treated with concurrent pemetrexed/erlotinib and maintenance erlotinib, and to describe quality of life (QOL) over time in this cohort. Methods A multi-institutional phase I/II clinical trial enrolled patients with R/SP HNSCC with disease within the 45 Gy isodose line. Patients were treated with concurrent pemetrexed/erlotinib followed by maintenance erlotinib. The MTD of concurrent erlotinib was determined using a 3+3 design. Adverse events (AEs) and patient-reported outcomes of QOL, including the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACT-HN) and MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) and the Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN), were collected at baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months after RT. Results In total, 27 patients were enrolled: 15 in phase I and 12 in phase II. Median prior RT dose was 66 Gy, and median reirradiation dose was 60 Gy. Two DLTs were observed in the 150 mg group; the MTD of erlotinib was 125 mg. Twenty-five of 27 patients experienced grade 3+ AEs. Best response was complete, partial, stable, and progressive in seven, seven, five, and four patients, respectively. Median PFS was 8.5 months, and median OS was 11.2 months. One-year PFS and OS rates were 33% and 44%, respectively. Mean FACT-HN trial outcome index ranged from 52 to 58 across all time points. Mean MDADI global and composite scores ranged from 57-75 to 56-66 over time, respectively. No differences in mean FACT-HN, MDADI, and PSS-HN scores were identified from baseline to six months. Conclusions In patients with R/SP HNSCC treated with reirradiation with concurrent pemetrexed/erlotinib followed by maintenance erlotinib, toxicity is high, disease control is consistent with prior reirradiation studies, and patient-reported QOL is unchanged within a short-term follow-up of six months.

Indexed as

head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (hnscc)patient-reported outcome measuresquality of liferadiotherapy (rt)reirradiation

Identifiers

PMID42116977
PMCPMC13157865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.