ReviewCureus2026
Blood Transfusion Practices in Rural Hospitals: Indications, Challenges, and Practical Solutions.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood transfusion (BT), red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, patient blood management (PBM), and transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs) remain central to emergency and routine care in settings where access, safety, and logistics are constrained. Evidence gaps persist due to the cost and time requirements of TTI testing, limited ongoing surveillance within district systems, and diagnostic delays that shift decision-making away from laboratory thresholds. This narrative review aims to synthesise BT indications, operational challenges, and practical solutions relevant to decentralised and remote hospital environments. A structured literature synthesis was conducted using databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, applying predefined search terms related to BT practices, rural healthcare, and transfusion safety for studies published between 2015 and 2025; studies were selected based on relevance to clinical indications, logistical challenges, and safety outcomes in resource-limited settings. Key outcomes included comparative transfusion threshold findings in haemoglobinopathies and sepsis, the feasibility of universal-donor products in trauma, and the role of cold-chain and storage systems in maintaining supply integrity. Practice implications include prioritising physiological criteria for urgent BT when laboratory access is delayed, while strengthening governance through clinical audits and point-of-care electronic verification. The findings support integrated transfusion pathways that combine decentralised preparedness with mandatory pathogen screening and standardised monitoring frameworks. The central takeaway is that safe rural BT systems require coordinated investment in supply resilience, workforce competency, and technology-enabled verification, rather than reliance on isolated interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.