Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42116971›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Blood Transfusion Practices in Rural Hospitals: Indications, Challenges, and Practical Solutions.

Vijay Ramesh Topno, Ghanshyam Bihari, Gaurav Mishra, Dharmendra Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vijay Ramesh TopnoDepartment of Pathology, Tata Main Hospital, Noamundi, IND.
Ghanshyam BihariDepartment of Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT), Tata Main Hospital, Noamundi, IND.
Gaurav MishraDepartment of General Medicine, Tata Main Hospital, Noamundi, IND.
Dharmendra KumarDepartment of General Medicine, Tata Main Hospital, Noamundi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood transfusion (BT), red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, patient blood management (PBM), and transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs) remain central to emergency and routine care in settings where access, safety, and logistics are constrained. Evidence gaps persist due to the cost and time requirements of TTI testing, limited ongoing surveillance within district systems, and diagnostic delays that shift decision-making away from laboratory thresholds. This narrative review aims to synthesise BT indications, operational challenges, and practical solutions relevant to decentralised and remote hospital environments. A structured literature synthesis was conducted using databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, applying predefined search terms related to BT practices, rural healthcare, and transfusion safety for studies published between 2015 and 2025; studies were selected based on relevance to clinical indications, logistical challenges, and safety outcomes in resource-limited settings. Key outcomes included comparative transfusion threshold findings in haemoglobinopathies and sepsis, the feasibility of universal-donor products in trauma, and the role of cold-chain and storage systems in maintaining supply integrity. Practice implications include prioritising physiological criteria for urgent BT when laboratory access is delayed, while strengthening governance through clinical audits and point-of-care electronic verification. The findings support integrated transfusion pathways that combine decentralised preparedness with mandatory pathogen screening and standardised monitoring frameworks. The central takeaway is that safe rural BT systems require coordinated investment in supply resilience, workforce competency, and technology-enabled verification, rather than reliance on isolated interventions.

Indexed as

blood transfusioncold chainpatient blood managementrural hospitalstransfusion safety

Identifiers

PMID42116971
PMCPMC13157523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.