ReviewCureus2026
Prehabilitation in Cardiovascular Surgery: Concepts, Evidence, and Future Direction.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery are increasingly older and multimorbid, with a high prevalence of frailty, sarcopenia, malnutrition, and psychological vulnerability, all of which are strongly associated with adverse postoperative outcomes yet remain incompletely captured by conventional risk models. Prehabilitation has emerged as a proactive, multimodal strategy to address these modifiable vulnerabilities in the preoperative period. This narrative review synthesizes contemporary evidence on prehabilitation in adult cardiovascular surgery, focusing on its core components, reported clinical benefits, feasibility, and barriers to implementation. Current evidence indicates that exercise-based prehabilitation, particularly programs incorporating aerobic training and inspiratory muscle training, is safe and feasible and improves preoperative functional capacity, with consistent reductions in postoperative pulmonary complications and hospital length of stay. Nutritional optimization, smoking and alcohol cessation, psychological preparation, and targeted comorbidity management further support physiological resilience and patient readiness for surgery, although these domains remain underrepresented in cardiac-specific trials. Despite growing interest, the evidence base is limited by heterogeneous program designs, variable outcome measures, short intervention windows, and a lack of adequately powered randomized trials. Integration of prehabilitation into established perioperative care pathways, improved patient selection using frailty and fitness assessment, and scalable delivery models, including tele-prehabilitation, are needed to support wider adoption. Overall, prehabilitation represents a promising patient-centered strategy to improve recovery and resilience in adult cardiovascular surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.