Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42116932›Full record

ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2026

Dermatologists' Perspectives on Skincare Routine Trends.

Mila Poelhekken, Sebastiaan A S van der Bent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mila PoelhekkenDepartment of Dermatology, Alrijne Hospital, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6022-7851
Sebastiaan A S van der BentDepartment of Dermatology, Alrijne Hospital, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3380-4075

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multi-step skincare routines have become increasingly popular, particularly among adolescents and young adults, driven by social media exposure and commercial marketing. Although individual skincare ingredients have demonstrated efficacy for specific dermatological conditions, evidence supporting the routine use of elaborate multi-step regimens in otherwise healthy skin remains limited. Concerns have been raised regarding potential adverse effects and misinformation, especially among younger users. Objective: To explore dermatologists' perspectives on multi-step skincare routines, including perceived risks and benefits, observed complications, and the influence of social media. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional digital survey was distributed to Dutch dermatologists and dermatology residents via the Dutch Society for Dermatology and Venereology. The questionnaire addressed attitudes toward skincare trends, observed dermatoses, implicated ingredients, recommended routine complexity, and perceived social media impact. Associations were analyzed using Fisher's Exact Test, Mann-Whitney Results: A total of 168 respondents participated, including 146 board-certified dermatologists and 22 dermatology residents. Most respondents (91.6%) expressed concern about the popularity of multi-step skincare routines, and 88.1% reported regularly encountering skincare-related skin problems, most commonly irritant eczema, perioral dermatitis, allergic contact dermatitis, and acne exogenica. Retinoids, exfoliating acids, fragrances, and products marketed as natural were frequently mentioned in association with these complaints. Despite concerns, 79.8% acknowledged potential benefits, such as increased awareness of skin health and sun protection. Nearly all respondents identified daily sunscreen use as essential, whereas only 12.5% actively recommended multi-step routines. Social media was perceived as highly influential, with frequent reports of misinformation and delayed medical consultation. Conclusion: Dermatologists report substantial concern regarding complex skincare routines, particularly in relation to complications and misinformation among younger users. Although some benefits are recognized, professional recommendations emphasize simplicity and daily sun protection.

Indexed as

adolescentscontact dermatitiscosmetic dermatologyskincare routinesskin irritationsocial media

Identifiers

PMID42116932
PMCPMC13157809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.