ArticleSurgical neurology international2026
Brain abscess management: A decade of experience.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Brain abscess remains a significant neurosurgical challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, despite advances in neuroimaging, microbiological diagnostics, and surgical techniques. Optimal management requires a combination of timely diagnosis, appropriate antimicrobial therapy, and judicious surgical intervention. Methods: This retrospective single-center study analyzed 59 patients who underwent surgical management for intracranial brain abscesses over 10 years (January 2015-December 2024). Demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, predisposing factors, radiological features, microbiological profile, surgical modality, and outcomes were evaluated. Neurological status at admission was assessed using the Glasgow Coma Scale, and outcomes were measured at 6 months using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Outcomes were categorized as favorable (GOS 4-5) or unfavorable (GOS 1-3). Results: The majority of patients were male (72.9%), with a mean age higher in the unfavorable outcome group. Single abscesses were observed in 48 patients (81.4%). The frontal lobe was the most common location (30.5%), followed by the temporal (23.7%) and cerebellar (13.6%) lobes. Headache (72.9%), fever (52.5%), seizures (50.8%), and focal neurological deficits (44.1%) were the predominant presenting symptoms. No identifiable predisposing factor was found in 50.8% of cases, whereas post-traumatic etiology was the most common identifiable cause (16.9%). Microbiological cultures were positive in 27 patients (45.8%), with Conclusion: A combined medical and surgical approach yields favorable outcomes in the majority of patients with brain abscess. Image-guided aspiration is an effective first-line surgical modality in appropriately selected cases, whereas craniotomy and excision remain essential for complex or refractory lesions. Early diagnosis, prompt antimicrobial therapy, and timely surgical intervention are critical determinants of outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.