ArticleSurgical neurology international2026
A reproducible deep dorsal root entry zone lesioning technique for cervical root avulsion: Outcomes from a clinical series.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neuropathic pain following traumatic cervical root avulsion remains a major clinical challenge when conservative therapies fail. Ablative neurosurgical procedures such as dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) lesioning continue to play a role in this refractory population. We present our experience with a standardized, reproducible microsurgical deep DREZ technique and compare outcomes with those reported in the literature. Methods: We conducted a retrospective series of six patients with intractable neuropathic pain due to root avulsion, treated between 2021 and 2025 at a tertiary referral center in Southern Brazil. All surgeries were performed microsurgically under intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Lesions were made at a fixed depth of 4-5 mm targeting Rexed laminae I-VI. Pre and postoperative pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS); postoperative analgesic use and complications were also recorded. Results were contextualized against published data from both superficial and deep DREZ approaches. Results: Postoperative VAS scores ranged from 0 to 3, corresponding to a 66.7-100% reduction in pain; two patients (33.3%) achieved complete pain abolition. Four patients (66.7%) discontinued analgesic medication entirely. The remaining two patients maintained reduced - but altered - pain patterns compared with baseline. No permanent neurological deficits, cerebrospinal fluid leaks, infections, or autonomic disturbances occurred. One patient had a wound dehiscence that was successfully managed. These outcomes are comparable with modern deep DREZ series and appear superior to those historically reported for superficial techniques. Conclusion: A microsurgical standardized deep DREZ lesioning technique targeting laminae I-VI demonstrates high efficacy, reproducibility, and a favorable safety profile for the management of refractory neuropathic pain after cervical root avulsion. Our findings support the adoption of this reproducible technique in specialized centers, although larger prospective studies are necessary to confirm long-term durability across institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.