ArticleSurgical neurology international2026
Cranioplasty as a therapeutic intervention for refractory postdecompressive craniectomy seizures in combat-traumatic brain injury: A report of two cases.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Combat-traumatic brain injury from penetrating and blast mechanisms frequently necessitates decompressive craniectomy (DC), leaving patients with large skull defects and retained metallic fragments that substantially elevate seizure risk. Syndrome of the trephined (SoT) and sinking skin flap syndrome (SSFS) are severe neurological complications attributed to disturbed cerebral hemodynamics, atmospheric pressure effects, and altered brain architecture following DC. Patients may develop refractory seizures, altered consciousness, and progressive neurological deficits despite maximal medical therapy. Case Description: We report two young male soldiers (aged 24 and 30 years) who sustained severe combat-traumatic brain injuries (gunshot/shrapnel and mine-blast, respectively) requiring emergency DC. Both patients had retained intracerebral metallic fragments, conferring a high baseline seizure risk. Both developed refractory seizures unresponsive to multidrug antiepileptic therapy, accompanied by progressive neurological deterioration. Case 1 presented with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 7 and persistent tonic seizures despite triple antiepileptic therapy (valproic acid, carbamazepine, and levetiracetam). Case 2 presented with a GCS of 8, decorticate posturing, vegetative state features, refractory seizures, and an 8.7mm midline shift. Both patients underwent cranioplasty with patient-specific 3D-printed titanium implants 62-65-day postinjury. Following cranioplasty, both demonstrated marked clinical improvement, including complete seizure cessation within 5-8 days, reduction in antiepileptic medications, and significant neurological recovery. Case 1 achieved GCS 15 and a Glasgow outcome scale-extended (GOSE) score of 4 at 5 months. Case 2 progressed from a vegetative state to minimally conscious state 12 at 5 weeks, with a GOSE score of 3. Conclusion: These cases highlight SoT and SSFS as potential primary drivers of refractory seizures and neurological deterioration after DC. Early cranioplasty (within 2-3 months) may result in dramatic seizure control and functional recovery, even in patients with severe disorders of consciousness. Cranioplasty should be considered a therapeutic, not merely cosmetic, intervention in such patients. In patients with post-DC refractory seizures and signs of SoT/SSFS, early cranioplasty should be considered a potential disease-modifying therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.