ArticleSurgical neurology international2026
Intraoperative ultrasonography with intraoperative MRI confirmation in glioma surgery: Evaluating a combined resection strategy.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Various intraoperative imaging adjuncts help detect residual tumor and maximize the extent of resection (EOR) in glioma surgery. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (IOMRI) and intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) are potent technologies used to guide resection. The primary objective of this study was to effectively combine these two modalities for glioma resection, compare them for residual tumor detection, and examine their respective advantages. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted over 2 years, and patients with glioma involving eloquent or near-eloquent regions were included. They underwent surgical resections guided by combining IOUS and IOMRI. IOUS was done preresection and also used to monitor resection. IOMRI was done at the end of the intended tumor resection. Basic patient characteristics, IOUS and IOMRI findings, and surgical outcomes were evaluated. Results: Thirty-four patients were included in the study. The mean age was 39.47 ± 11.04 years; 41.2% of the tumors were insular gliomas, and 61.8% were high-grade gliomas (grade 3 or 4). The median EOR was 91.42% (80.47-99.44%), and the median residual tumor volume was 4.46 cc (0.22-8.30 cc). 29.4% (10/34) of patients underwent further resection after IOMRI, resulting in a 10% increase in median EOR; nine of these were insular gliomas. The estimates of the EOR on IOUS and IOMRI were concordant in 64.7% of cases and discordant in 35.3% of cases. IOUS had a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 100% to detect residual tumor compared to IOMRI. Conclusion: A combined strategy using IOUS for intraoperative guidance and IOMRI as final confirmation yielded favorable surgical outcomes. IOUS, although comparable to IOMRI in detecting residual tumor, IOMRI proved beneficial, especially in insular gliomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.