Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42116853›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering and computational biology2026

Automated Lesion Segmentation in Medical Imaging via Integration of nnU-Net Optimization and SAM Approach.

Alejandro Jerónimo, Ignacio Rojas, Olga Valenzuela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering and computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alejandro JerónimoComputer Engineering, Automatics and Robotics Department, University of Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0268-7568
Ignacio RojasComputer Engineering, Automatics and Robotics Department, University of Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1033-5635
Olga ValenzuelaDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6034-9392

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Deep learning has transformed medical imaging by enabling earlier and more accurate disease diagnosis. Lesion and tumor segmentation, essential for analyzing and tracking morphological changes, is commonly done with U-Net variants, though these often lack cross-domain generalization and do not fully leverage foundation models like the Segment Anything Model (SAM), which still requires manual intervention to define the region of interest (ROI). Objectives: To enhance generalization and reduce manual intervention by combining the automatic optimization of nnU-Net with the precision of SAM. Design: Experimental evaluation of a hybrid segmentation framework for lung nodule analysis. Methods: We propose a novel approach integrating the automatic optimization capabilities of nnU-Net for lesion detection with the high-precision segmentation of SAM, eliminating the need for manual intervention by the clinician. The method was evaluated on the LIDC-IDRI dataset, a widely recognized benchmark for lung nodule segmentation. Results: Our approach produces more anatomically coherent segmentations than nnU-Net alone. In many cases, the resulting boundaries more closely reflect true nodule morphology than individual expert annotations, despite high inter-expert variability. Conclusion: The proposed integration of nnU-Net with SAM enables fully automated lesion segmentation without manual intervention. The method improves generalization and accuracy across medical imaging domains, achieving expert-level performance in pulmonary nodule segmentation.

Indexed as

deep learninglung nodulemedical imagingnnU-NetSAMsemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID42116853
PMCPMC13157531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.