Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42116838›Full record

ArticleThe journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association2025

Mapping the bioinformatics resource landscape: an analysis of LibGuides across Canadian universities.

Grailing Anthonisen, Lisa Banks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Grailing AnthonisenMA, (MISt in progress), McGill University, University of New Brunswick - Saint John, Montreal, QC.
Lisa BanksMA, MISt, McGill University, Acting Collections Management Librarian, New Brunswick Public Library Service, Fredericton, NB.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The initial introduction of LibGuides created a seismic shift in bioinformatic information dissemination. This study reviewed bioinformatics LibGuides from Canadian universities to establish a consistent overlap of frequently recommended materials that would spell out a canon of bioinformatics resources. Methods: We undertook a manual review of the 11 bioinformatics-specific LibGuides created by Canadian university libraries. Results: We found four (n=4) LibGuides focused solely on bioinformatics and seven (n=7) guides with subsections dedicated to bioinformatics. Overall, there were 566 resources distributed across 11 LibGuides, with little overlap across guides. Most (n=440) were distinct resources. The most common resource type was database and the most frequently appearing resources (n=5) were BLAST Database, Protein Data Bank, and PubMed. Discussion: We identified clear variations in the intended audience for these subject guides, as well as commonalities across all 11. The diversity of listed resources reflects the diversity and interdisciplinary nature of bioinformatics. Despite this variety of resources, we observed a uniformity in those resources' funding or hosting, as they are often American in origin. This now represents a concern for librarians and other information professionals when it comes to using and teaching bioinformatics resources.

Identifiers

PMID42116838
PMCPMC13157969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.