ReviewResearch and reports in urology2026
Management and Treatment Strategies for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Insights.
Review in Research and reports in urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a relatively uncommon urologic malignancy that has historically a worse prognosis than urothelial carcinoma of the bladder due to higher rate of invasion and worse morbidity in patients. However, recent developments in treatment possess great potential for improved outcomes in these patients. This review compiles the most recent practices in treating this disease, and avenues for future modalities. Risk stratification of UTUC guides treatment and surveillance, with neoadjuvant chemotherapy employed in higher stage, to improve oncologic outcome. Surgical management for UTUC includes endoscopic management (EM) and kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) for low risk (LR) disease, and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for high risk (HR) disease. EM may follow a retrograde or antegrade approach, preserving renal function at the cost of increased risk of recurrence. Topical therapies provide great potential for low-cost, outpatient procedures for LR disease, but their efficacy is poorly characterized. While RNU remains the gold standard, robot-assisted nephroureterectomy is the dominant modality, with lower rates of perioperative complications while maintaining comparable outcomes with respect to the open approach. Perioperative intravesical therapy is universally incorporated to reduce the risk of intravesical recurrence. The POUT trial demonstrated improved disease-free survival with adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy following RNU, establishing it as standard of care in locally advanced disease, while enfortumab vedotin in combination with pembrolizumab has demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free and overall survival in the metastatic setting. Future implementation of biomarker technologies discloses the potential for improved screening and surveillance at low-cost. Treatment strategies for UTUC are rapidly expanding due to advances in diagnostic technologies and the emergence of novel systemic agents, including antibody-drug conjugates and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Proper management requires accurate risk stratification, with EM suitable for LR disease and RNU for HR disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.