Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42116735›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of industrial medicine2026

Integrating Occupational Health and Safety Into the Artificial Intelligence System Life Cycle.

Jared Bierbrier, Arif Jetha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of industrial medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jared BierbrierInstitute for Work & Health (IWH), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Arif JethaInstitute for Work & Health (IWH), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0322-7027

Funding

WorkSafe Ontario Fund JETH2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are rapidly transforming the workplace, performing tasks once limited to human intelligence such as decision-making, prediction, and pattern recognition. While AI adoption offers opportunities to improve productivity, it can also create new occupational hazards and alter working conditions in ways that may harm worker health, safety, and wellbeing. Despite broader and growing attention to safe and responsible AI, there is limited integration of occupational health and safety (OHS) principles into AI design and adoption decisions. This paper outlines a framework for embedding an OHS perspective throughout the AI system life cycle, from problem definition to system retirement. The framework aims to ensure that safety, fairness, and worker wellbeing are prioritized in AI. We describe key OHS goals for each phase of the AI life cycle and describe practical strategies to support implementation. These strategies include participatory co-design with workers, equitable data collection, model training and validation that identify and minimize safety risks, transparent deployment practices, and continuous monitoring and retraining guided by risk management frameworks. We emphasize collaboration among AI system developers, OHS professionals, and worker and workplace representatives, to anticipate and address emerging risks. Integrating OHS principles into the AI system life cycle not only helps prevent harm but also fosters worker trust, strengthens system reliability, and promotes sustainable technological adoption. Embedding OHS principles into AI development ensures that the technology contributes to, rather than compromises, the protection and wellbeing of workers in a changing world of work.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceOccupational HealthSafety ManagementHumansIntelligent SystemsRisk ManagementWorking ConditionsWorkplaceAI system designalgorithmic biasartificial intelligence (AI)occupational health and safety (OHS)risk management

Identifiers

PMID42116735
PMCPMC13241862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.