ArticleQuarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)2026
Reward History and Multisensory Signals Interact in a Localisation Task.
Article in Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previously rewarded stimuli can influence later performance even when they are task-irrelevant, while multisensory stimuli often enhance perceptual salience and speed responses to targets. This study examined how reward history and multisensory stimulus configuration jointly shape behaviour in a speeded localisation task. Participants first learned associations between visual stimuli and high or low reward. In a subsequent test phase, they localised an unrewarded visual target while a previously rewarded distractor appeared in the opposite hemifield. Target and distractor modalities were independently varied between unisensory visual and multisensory audiovisual stimuli. Responses were faster to multisensory than unisensory targets, and high-value distractors slowed responses relative to low-value distractors when both target and distractor were unisensory. However, when targets were multisensory and distractors were unisensory, distractor value no longer influenced response times. Multisensory signals at the distractor produced more complex effects: when the target was multisensory, high-value multisensory distractors slowed responses more than high-value unisensory distractors, whereas when the target was unisensory, high-value multisensory distractors produced less slowing than high-value unisensory distractors. These findings show that reward history and multisensory stimulus configuration interact in shaping target-localisation performance. The observed effects may reflect attentional selection, response selection, or interactions between these processes, but not necessarily attentional selection. To determine this, future designs should disambiguate target location and response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.