ArticleSmall methods2026
Direct Measurement of Protein Corona Thickness on Nanomaterials Using Dual-Color Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy (STORM).
Article in Small methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanoparticles introduced to biological media rapidly adsorb proteins to form a protein corona that alters their surface identity and governs biological interactions. While protein corona composition has been extensively studied, its spatial structure, particularly thickness at the single-particle level, remains poorly resolved. Here, we establish and validate a strategy using dual-color stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) for the direct measurement of hard corona thickness on individual nanoparticles. The nanoparticle surface and retained protein corona were labeled with spectrally distinct fluorophores, allowing the radial separation between the nanoparticle and adsorbed protein layer to be determined from single-particle localization distributions. Applied to dense silica, mesoporous silica, and polystyrene nanoparticles, the method revealed a remarkably consistent hard corona thickness of approximately 50 nm, with particle-level standard deviations ranging from 12 to 27 nm. Sensitivity analysis, localization precision assessment, control experiments, and day-to-day reproducibility measurements supported the robustness of the measurement strategy. Proteomic analysis showed similar molecular weight distributions across all nanoparticle classes, consistent with the comparable external surface chemistries used here.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.