ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2026
"Just the way we always did it": ophthalmologist perspectives on changing routine anesthesia care for cataract surgery in the United States.
Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCataract surgery is one of the most common elective outpatient surgeries performed among older adults in the United States. Modern surgical technique makes cataract surgery a relatively quick, low-risk, minimally invasive outpatient procedure that can be performed solely under ophthalmologist-directed local or topical anesthesia. However, in the US, the procedure is routinely performed with additional monitoring and intravenous sedation administered by anesthesia-trained personnel. Given the procedure's safety profile, we sought to characterize ophthalmologists' perspectives on barriers preventing the adoption of more individualized approaches to cataract surgery sedation that do not automatically default to employing routine anesthesia care.
methodsThis study was conducted between December 2022 to January 2024. Using a semi-structured interview guide developed with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) framework, we completed interviews with ophthalmologists who performed cataract surgery with or without anesthesia care in hospital outpatient departments, ambulatory surgery centers, minor procedure rooms, and/or office-based surgery suites across the United States. Data were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach to uncover descriptive themes.
resultsWe interviewed 19 ophthalmologists (5 women), including 6 who had experience routinely performing cataract surgery without anesthesia care. Three major themes emerged: (1) inertia, defined as the tendency to continue established practices that serve to maintain the status quo, (2) financial considerations, and (3) the interdependent relationship between ophthalmology and anesthesiology. While some participants supported a more selective approach to the use of anesthesia services, study participants identified multiple barriers to change, including difficulty overcoming the current inertia, decreased reimbursement for office-based surgery, and concerns about implications for patient safety without routine anesthesia involvement.
conclusionOphthalmologists identified multiple barriers to changing current anesthesia-led sedation models for cataract surgery. Our findings can help inform future efforts to better align anesthesia care with patient and procedural needs in an aging US population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.