ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Flexible arthroscopy improves anterior visualization of the capitellum compared with a conventional 30° arthroscope: a cadaveric study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArthroscopy of the elbow joint is usually performed with a 30° view. Stability tests, structural assessments and pathologies are described with this scope. Due to the anatomy of the distal humerus and the arthroscopic accessibility, the assessment of the capitellum, particularly with regard to cartilage damage, is limited in terms of dimension and depth. Arthroscopy with flexible optics in the range of 15° to 90° has not been routinely performed. The aim of the study was to investigate whether the use of flexible optics offers advantages in the assessment of the capitellum.
methodsEleven fresh-frozen human cadaveric elbows were examined in a standardized free-hanging position with the elbow flexed to 90°. Arthroscopy was performed through the proximal posterolateral portal using a rigid 30° arthroscope and a flexible 15°-90° arthroscope. The most anterior visible margin of the capitellar articular surface was identified and marked arthroscopically for each optic. Following open surgical dislocation of the elbow, the distance between the two markings was measured in millimeters. Paired comparisons were performed using a paired t-test, and effect size was calculated using Cohen's d.
resultsIn all specimens, the flexible 15°-90° arthroscope provided greater anterior visualization of the capitellum compared with the 30° arthroscope. The mean additional visible distance was 7.0 ± 2.5 mm (95% CI 5.3-8.7 mm). This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001) with a large effect size (Cohen's d = 2.654).
conclusionsA flexible 15°-90° arthroscope significantly increased anterior visualization of the capitellum compared with a conventional 30° arthroscope in this cadaveric model. Whether this anatomical visualization gain translates into clinical diagnostic or therapeutic benefit requires further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.