ArticleGenome medicine2026
Unprocessed U1 snRNAs as a biomarker of INTS11- and BRAT1-related neurodevelopmental disorders.
Article in Genome medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDisrupted RNA processing is increasingly recognized as a key driver of severe neurodevelopmental disorders. Variants in the Integrator catalytic subunit INTS11 and its binding partner BRAT1 lead to clinically overlapping phenotypes, yet only the molecular function of INTS11 has been relatively well characterized. In contrast, the mechanistic contribution of BRAT1 to RNA metabolism and disease has remained unclear, leaving major gaps in variant interpretation and diagnostic classification.
methodsWe employed an integrated genetic, molecular, and in vivo approach to investigate the impact of INTS11 and BRAT1 mutations on U small nuclear RNA (U snRNA) processing. Patient-derived fibroblasts and lymphoblastoid cells were analysed by western blotting, RT-qPCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization to assess U1 snRNA 3'-end processing and nuclear retention. To validate the functional consequences of Integrator deficiency in vivo, we generated and characterized an ints11 knockout zebrafish model.
resultsWe identified novel biallelic variants in INTS11 and BRAT1 in individuals with overlapping neurodevelopmental features. While defective snRNA processing is anticipated in INTS11 deficiency, this study provides the first direct demonstration of impaired U1 snRNA processing across multiple INTS11-mutated patient cells. Critically, we show that BRAT1 mutations also compromise U1 snRNA 3'-end processing, leading to nuclear accumulation of unprocessed transcripts. These findings provide direct evidence of BRAT1's role in RNA processing and establish Integrator dysfunction as a primary pathogenic mechanism in BRAT1-associated neurological disease. The magnitude of U1 snRNA misprocessing closely correlates with clinical severity across the BRAT1 cohort, highlighting its potential as a diagnostic biomarker. Consistently, the ints11 knockout zebrafish model recapitulates core patient features - including microcephaly, neurodevelopmental defects, and U snRNA processing defects - further validating the causal role of Integrator deficiency in vivo.
conclusionsOur results redefine BRAT1-associated neurological disorders as Integrator-related diseases driven by RNA processing defects. Nuclear accumulation of unprocessed U1 snRNAs emerges as a robust biomarker for variant interpretation, disease severity, and patient stratification, particularly in BRAT1 cases. These findings broaden the clinical and molecular spectrum of Integrator dysfunction and provide a foundation for improved diagnostic and translational approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.