ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Optimizing treatment strategies for femoral neck fractures using a machine learning model.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecently, advances in machine learning models have allowed for automatic and highly accurate detection of fractures. To date, however, no machine learning models have been developed for the automatic selection of treatment strategies for femoral neck fractures. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the performance of a machine learning model that would recommend either internal fixation or implant replacement for the surgical treatment of femoral neck fractures.
methodsWe constructed a dataset comprising 535 preoperative anteroposterior hip radiographs obtained from 297 patients with femoral neck fractures who underwent surgical treatment (implant replacement, n = 182; internal fixation, n = 115). After splitting the dataset into training, validation, and test sets, binary classification models were developed to recommend the optimal surgical procedure using two convolutional neural network architectures: EfficientNetV2-S and VGG16. Model performance was compared using an independent test set. To investigate the evidence underlying each model's decision-making, regions of interest were visualized using Grad-CAM and Layer-CAM.
resultsThe agreement rate for surgical procedure selection on the test set was 0.828 ± 0.039 and 0.821 ± 0.045 for EfficientNetV2-S and VGG16, respectively. The F1-scores for EfficientNetV2-S and VGG16 were 0.833 ± 0.047 and 0.839 ± 0.041, whereas the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were 0.876 ± 0.028 and 0.920 ± 0.009, respectively. Grad-CAM and Layer-CAM heatmaps suggested that the VGG16 model more frequently attended to regions outside the fracture site.
conclusionBoth VGG16- and EfficientNetV2-S-based models showed good performance in recommending the surgical strategy for femoral neck fractures. VGG16 yielded a significantly higher AUC, whereas EfficientNetV2-S had a more favorable computational cost and explainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.