ArticleHuman resources for health2026
Bridging the gap: disparities in perceptions of the "second victim" phenomenon between Israeli policymakers and frontline nurses.
Article in Human resources for health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe "second victim" phenomenon (SVP) refers to healthcare providers who experience profound emotional and physical distress following adverse patient events. This phenomenon is a significant driver of burnout and can severely compromise both professional functioning and patient safety.
objectiveThis study aims to investigate the specific disparities in perceptions between policymakers and frontline nurses regarding the SVP within the Israeli healthcare system.
methodsThirty in-depth interviews were conducted: 15 with policymakers and 15 with nurses who had firsthand experience as second victims. A convenience sampling method was used for both groups. Data were synthesized and analyzed using comparative thematic synthesis.
resultsThe findings revealed profound and pervasive perceptual gaps across several key domains. First, policymakers often restricted the definition of SVP to critical medical errors, whereas nurses perceived it broadly, irrespective of actual outcomes. Second, while policymakers viewed the phenomenon as rare and transient, nurses consistently reported it as an enduring occupational challenge with deep personal impact. Third, organizations predominantly offered reactive support, which stood in stark contrast to the nurses' preference for proactive and routine assistance.
conclusionSignificant perceptual gaps exist between Israeli policymakers and nurses regarding SVP. Addressing these disparities is crucial for developing proactive support policies, ultimately fostering provider well-being and enhancing the overall quality of patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.