ReviewExperimental hematology & oncology2026
Hierarchies of resistance to DNA damage response inhibitors: from pathway restoration to replication stress tolerance.
Review in Experimental hematology & oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA damage response (DDR) inhibitors have reshaped precision oncology by exploiting tumor-specific vulnerabilities in genome maintenance and replication stress control. The clinical success of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors-particularly in homologous recombination-deficient cancers-has validated this strategy, establishing a paradigmatic model for DDR-targeted therapies; however, both intrinsic and acquired resistance remain pervasive and limit durable benefit. In this Review, we analyze resistance mechanisms with a framework centered on PARP inhibitor biology, while extending key principles to other DDR-targeting strategies. We propose a hierarchical model that distinguishes dominant resistance drivers-mechanisms that restore DNA repair capacity or bypass the inhibited node (e.g., homologous recombination reactivation or checkpoint rewiring)-from adaptive resistance mechanisms that increase replication stress tolerance without restoring repair function, including replication-fork protection, metabolic reprogramming, cellular plasticity, and microenvironmental support. We discuss how tumor heterogeneity and therapy-imposed selective pressures shape clonal evolution and complicate biomarker development. We also critically evaluate combination strategies, highlighting why strong mechanistic rationale often fails to translate into consistent clinical benefit due to toxicity, scheduling constraints, and insufficient biomarker guidance. Finally, we outline priorities for moving beyond static genomic classifiers toward functional and longitudinal assessment of replication stress, DNA repair engagement, and tumor evolution to support more durable, biologically informed therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.