Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42116135›Full record

ReviewExperimental hematology & oncology2026

Hierarchies of resistance to DNA damage response inhibitors: from pathway restoration to replication stress tolerance.

Valentina Morgera, Antonia Feola, Antonella Romano, Maria Vittoria Napoli, Armando Gabrielli, Vittorio Enrico Avvedimento, Antonio Porcellini, Antonio Pezone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental hematology & oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Valentina MorgeraDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cintia, 21, 80126, Naples, Italy.
Antonia FeolaDepartment of Life Science, Health and Health Professions, Link Campus University, Rome, Italy.
Antonella RomanoDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cintia, 21, 80126, Naples, Italy.
Maria Vittoria NapoliDepartment of Rheumatology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Armando GabrielliDepartment of Rheumatology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Vittorio Enrico AvvedimentoIMAGE S.R.L., Academic Spin-off of the University of Naples Federico II, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Antonio PorcelliniDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cintia, 21, 80126, Naples, Italy. antonio.porcellini@unina.it.
Antonio PezoneDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cintia, 21, 80126, Naples, Italy. antonio.pezone@unina.it.

Funding

Programma Operativo Nazionale Ricerca e Competitività E65F21002850007Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II FRA2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA damage response (DDR) inhibitors have reshaped precision oncology by exploiting tumor-specific vulnerabilities in genome maintenance and replication stress control. The clinical success of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors-particularly in homologous recombination-deficient cancers-has validated this strategy, establishing a paradigmatic model for DDR-targeted therapies; however, both intrinsic and acquired resistance remain pervasive and limit durable benefit. In this Review, we analyze resistance mechanisms with a framework centered on PARP inhibitor biology, while extending key principles to other DDR-targeting strategies. We propose a hierarchical model that distinguishes dominant resistance drivers-mechanisms that restore DNA repair capacity or bypass the inhibited node (e.g., homologous recombination reactivation or checkpoint rewiring)-from adaptive resistance mechanisms that increase replication stress tolerance without restoring repair function, including replication-fork protection, metabolic reprogramming, cellular plasticity, and microenvironmental support. We discuss how tumor heterogeneity and therapy-imposed selective pressures shape clonal evolution and complicate biomarker development. We also critically evaluate combination strategies, highlighting why strong mechanistic rationale often fails to translate into consistent clinical benefit due to toxicity, scheduling constraints, and insufficient biomarker guidance. Finally, we outline priorities for moving beyond static genomic classifiers toward functional and longitudinal assessment of replication stress, DNA repair engagement, and tumor evolution to support more durable, biologically informed therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDNA damage response (DDR) inhibitorsDrug resistancePrecision oncology

Identifiers

PMID42116135
PMCPMC13352934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.