Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42116114›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

The conditional indirect effect of perceived robot threat on employees' proactive behavior: the moderating role of human-robot interaction.

Songsong Cheng, Qunpeng Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Songsong ChengSchool of Accounting, Guangzhou College of Commerce, Guangzhou, 511363, China.
Qunpeng FanSchool of Economics, Management and Law, Jilin Normal University, Siping, 136000, China. fantasy_0115@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of artificial intelligence, an increasing number of robots are entering the workplace as active contributors to organizational tasks. While robots can enhance employees' efficiency by complementing human capabilities, they may also lead to strong perceptions of threat among employees. Integrating the threat-rigidity and threat-flexibility theory, the study examines how perceived robot threat indirectly affects employees' proactive behavior through emotional exhaustion and cognitive flexibility, and how these indirect effects are contingent on human-robot interaction. Focusing on task-oriented workplace robots, the study employs a multi-wave, multi-source field survey and a scenario-based experimental design conducted in China. Results show that when human-robot interaction intensity is low, perceived robot threat increases emotional exhaustion and limits cognitive flexibility, thereby indirectly inhibiting employees' proactive behavior. When interaction intensity is high, the positive effect of perceived robot threat on emotional exhaustion is attenuated or even reversed, and its positive effect on cognitive flexibility is strengthened, with these pathways indirectly promoting employees' proactive behavior. By adopting a human-robot interaction lens, the study reveals the boundary conditions in which perceived robot threat yields divergent indirect effects on employee behavior, offering insights for organizations seeking to anticipate and manage the psychological impact of workplace robots.

Indexed as

EmploymentRoboticsSocial BehaviorAdultArtificial IntelligenceChinaCognitive FlexibilityEmotional ExhaustionFemaleHumansIntelligent SystemsMaleWorkplaceYoung AdultCognitive flexibilityEmotional exhaustionEmployee proactive behaviorHuman–robot interactionPerceived robot threat

Identifiers

PMID42116114
PMCPMC13330324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.