ArticleBMC veterinary research2026
A comparative assessment of subchronic inhalation health risks between peracetic acid and chlorine dioxide in SPF pigs maintained in barrier environments.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBarrier environments are essential for maintaining specific pathogen-free (SPF) animals, yet the potential health risks associated with routine aerosol disinfection remain unclear. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the subchronic effects of peracetic acid (PAA) and chlorine dioxide (ClO₂) in SPF pigs maintained under barrier conditions.
resultsBoth disinfectants achieved > 99.9% elimination of indicator microorganisms under optimized aerosolization protocols. However, distinct biological effects were observed. ClO₂ predominantly affected systemic homeostasis, as reflected by alterations in hematological and biochemical parameters, whereas PAA exerted stronger localized effects on the respiratory system, including functional changes, tissue remodeling, and enhanced inflammatory responses. Additionally, both disinfectants induced structural remodeling of the respiratory microbiota, marked by a decline in Actinobacteriota and an enrichment of opportunistic taxa such as Burkholderiales in the ClO₂ group and Subdoligranulum in the PAA group. Notably, these effects remained subclinical and did not impair growth performance or overt health status.
conclusionsThese findings highlight the distinct subchronic health risk profiles associated with aerosolized disinfectant exposure and provide a scientific basis for optimizing disinfection protocols in SPF pig barrier facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.