Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42116105›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Effects of the Liverpool Citizens Support Scheme on mental health-related service utilisation: evidence from a natural experiment using instrumental variable analysis.

Huihui Song, Emma Coombes, Harris Kaloudis, Benjamin Barr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Huihui SongUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. huihui.song@liverpool.ac.uk.
Emma CoombesUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Harris KaloudisLancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Benjamin BarrUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR135517National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care North West Coast NIHR200182UK Research and Innovation ES/Z503022/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited evidence on how local welfare schemes may affect mental health. This study estimated the impact of the Liverpool Citizens Support Scheme on mental health-related service utilisation in one of the most socioeconomically disadvantaged areas of the UK. Introduced in 2013, the Liverpool Citizens Support Scheme aims to alleviate acute financial hardship by providing small grants to households in financial crisis. The scheme was open to all residents meeting financial eligibility criteria, but a policy change implemented in April 2023 restricted access for individuals living in social housing. This policy change constitutes a natural experiment that provides an opportunity to assess the mental health impact of local welfare provision. DATA AND

methodsWe used quarterly administrative data from the Liverpool Citizens Support Scheme from 2018 to 2023, linked at the small-area-level to healthcare data. The primary outcome was a quarterly mental health index constructed using four indicators of mental health service use: antidepressant prescriptions, mental health-related general practitioner (GP) consultations, accident and emergency (A&E) visits, and emergency hospital admissions. To address potential endogeneity in scheme uptake, we used an instrumental variable defined as the interaction between a post-policy indicator and the proportion of social housing tenants living in each neighbourhood, and estimated the association between grant provision and mental health-related service utilisation using two-stage least squares regression.

resultsEach additional £1 in grants issued per person per quarter was associated with a -0.07 reduction in the mental health index (95% CI: -0.11 to -0.02; p < 0.01), and with reductions of 309 antidepressant prescriptions per 1,000 of the population (95% CI: -536 to -83), 2.52 GP consultations per 1,000 (95% CI: -4.88 to -0.15), and 0.61 A&E visits per 1,000 (95% CI: -1.11 to -0.11). Under the assumptions of the instrumental variable design, these associations would correspond to an estimated saving of £0.45 to the health service for every £1 in grants issued (95% CI: £0.07 to £0.82), and £7,394,755 in total between 2018 and 2023 (95% CI: £1,150,295 to £13,474,887). Subgroup analysis suggested that differences in service utilisation were more pronounced for affected males, while there was no evidence of differential impact across age groups or income levels.

conclusionsThese findings are consistent with the interpretation that welfare support delivered through the Liverpool Citizens Support Scheme may be associated with reduced demand for mental health-related healthcare services. The study points to the potential value of local welfare interventions in supporting population health and addressing health inequalities in deprived communities, and suggests how such schemes may contribute to considerable cost savings to health services whilst also alleviating financial hardship.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CarePublic AssistanceAdultAgedEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedInstrumental variableLocal welfare reformMental healthPanel dataSocial policy

Identifiers

PMID42116105
PMCPMC13330352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.