ArticleBMC public health2026
Access to non-police crisis response for people who use drugs: lessons from community safety response programs in two U.S. cities.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCommunity Safety Response (CSR) programs increasingly provide non-police alternatives to behavioral health crises, but their role in addressing substance use calls remains poorly understood. This qualitative study examined how municipal stakeholders in Denver, Colorado and San Francisco, California perceive and operationalize CSR protocols for substance use-related emergencies.
methodsBetween 2021 and 2023, we conducted 82 semi-structured interviews and 32 field observations with 911 dispatchers, law enforcement, city officials, and alternative responders from Denver and San Francisco's respective CSR programs. Transcripts and field notes were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify attitudes toward substance use, decision-making processes for call deployment, and barriers and facilitators to routing of substance use related calls to alternative response.
resultsAlthough written protocols permitted non-police response to substance use calls absent violence or weapons, findings revealed a gap between policy and practice. Dispatcher and responder discretion played a central role in determining CSR deployment: while some stakeholders regularly sent alternative responders on substance use calls, others described any mention of drugs -particularly methamphetamines-as automatically triggering police involvement. Barriers to effective CSR response included limited referral options for people who use drugs, fragmented service systems, community tensions around visible drug use, and perceived safety concerns. Facilitators included CSR teams' unique engagement capacity and potential for peer specialist involvement.
conclusionTo promote effectiveness of CSR as a public health intervention to reduce morbidity and mortality, programs must address discretionary decision-making, enhance training on stigma and harm reduction principles, and coordinate with broader service systems to ensure equitable access to non-police responses for people who use drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.