ArticleBMC research notes2026
Benchmarking knowledge distillation for lightweight pneumonia detection: a multi-seed calibration study on PneumoniaMNIST.
Article in BMC research notes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo benchmark a very small convolutional neural network trained with and without knowledge distillation for pneumonia detection on PneumoniaMNIST, with emphasis on discrimination, calibration, efficiency, and external generalization.
resultsUsing the predefined MedMNIST v2 splits and 5 random seeds, a ResNet-18 teacher achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.9735 (95% confidence interval 0.9687-0.9782). A 60,642-parameter TinyCNN retained about 90% of teacher discrimination (0.8818, 0.8634-0.9001) while reducing parameters by 184-fold, multiply-accumulate operations by 10.9-fold, and batch-1 CPU inference time by 3.7-fold. Knowledge distillation did not provide consistent discrimination gains over vanilla training on this benchmark. The teacher was less well calibrated before temperature scaling, which improved its negative log-likelihood, Brier score, and expected calibration error. External zero-shot evaluation on Kermany and a balanced RSNA subset showed domain-shift degradation for all models, with partial recovery after brief fine-tuning but persistent teacher-student gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.