Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42116090›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2026

Benchmarking knowledge distillation for lightweight pneumonia detection: a multi-seed calibration study on PneumoniaMNIST.

Ryan Yi Sheng Neo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ryan Yi Sheng NeoIndependent Researcher, Singapore, Singapore. realryanneo@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo benchmark a very small convolutional neural network trained with and without knowledge distillation for pneumonia detection on PneumoniaMNIST, with emphasis on discrimination, calibration, efficiency, and external generalization.

resultsUsing the predefined MedMNIST v2 splits and 5 random seeds, a ResNet-18 teacher achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.9735 (95% confidence interval 0.9687-0.9782). A 60,642-parameter TinyCNN retained about 90% of teacher discrimination (0.8818, 0.8634-0.9001) while reducing parameters by 184-fold, multiply-accumulate operations by 10.9-fold, and batch-1 CPU inference time by 3.7-fold. Knowledge distillation did not provide consistent discrimination gains over vanilla training on this benchmark. The teacher was less well calibrated before temperature scaling, which improved its negative log-likelihood, Brier score, and expected calibration error. External zero-shot evaluation on Kermany and a balanced RSNA subset showed domain-shift degradation for all models, with partial recovery after brief fine-tuning but persistent teacher-student gaps.

Indexed as

Convolutional Neural NetworksImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLungPneumoniaBenchmarkingCalibrationChildDatasets as TopicHumansReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveChest X-rayDomain generalizationKnowledge distillationModel compressionPneumonia detection

Identifiers

PMID42116090
PMCPMC13330209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.