Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42116079›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026

TumorTwin: a Python framework for patient-specific digital twins in oncology.

Michael G Kapteyn, Anirban Chaudhuri, Ernesto A B F Lima, Graham Pash, Rafael Bravo, Karen E Willcox, Thomas E Yankeelov, David A Hormuth Ii

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Dynamic image-informed selection of biomechanical tumor growth models.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Translational barriers to digital twins in radiation oncology.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael G KapteynOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. michael.kapteyn@austin.utexas.edu.
Anirban ChaudhuriOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Ernesto A B F LimaOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Graham PashOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Rafael BravoOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Karen E WillcoxOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Thomas E YankeelovOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
David A Hormuth IiOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvances in the theory and methods of computational oncology have enabled accurate characterization and prediction of tumor growth and treatment response on a patient-specific basis. This capability can be integrated into a digital twin framework in which bi-directional data-flow between the physical tumor and the digital tumor facilitate dynamic model re-calibration, uncertainty quantification, and clinical decision-support via recommendation of optimal therapeutic interventions. However, many digital twin frameworks rely on bespoke implementations tailored to each disease site, modeling choice, and algorithmic implementation.

resultsWe present TumorTwin, a modular and differentiable software framework for initializing, updating, and leveraging patient-specific cancer tumor digital twins. TumorTwin is publicly available as a Python package, with associated documentation, datasets, and tutorials. Novel contributions include the development of a patient-data structure adaptable to different disease sites, a modular architecture to enable the composition of different data, model, solver, and optimization objects, and CPU or GPU parallelized implementations of forward model solves and gradient computations. We demonstrate the functionality of TumorTwin via an in silico dataset of high-grade glioma growth and response to radiation therapy.

conclusionThe TumorTwin framework enables rapid prototyping and testing of image-guided oncology digital twins. This allows researchers to systematically investigate different models, algorithms, disease sites, or treatment decisions while leveraging robust numerical and computational infrastructure.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalMedical OncologyNeoplasmsSoftwareAlgorithmsHumansComputational oncologyDifferentiable programmingDigital twinImage-based modelingMagnetic resonance imagingPythonSoftware

Identifiers

PMID42116079
PMCPMC13330372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.