Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42116056›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2026

Bypassing primary healthcare facilities for maternal and child health services in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

Myunggu Jung, Jaeun Son, Seungmi Lee, Sangchul Yoon

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Myunggu JungDepartment of Global Health, Graduate School of Public Health and Healthcare Management, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, 06591, South Korea.
Jaeun SonKOICA Senegal Office, Dakar, BP 45702, Senegal.
Seungmi LeeDepartment of Global Health, Graduate School of Public Health and Healthcare Management, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, 06591, South Korea.
Sangchul YoonDepartment of Global Health, Graduate School of Public Health and Healthcare Management, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, 06591, South Korea. syoon22@catholic.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundsBypassing primary healthcare (PHC) facilities for maternal and child health (MCH) services is an increasingly common phenomenon in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This behaviour can undermine health system efficiency by overburdening referral hospitals and leaving PHC centres underutilised in LMICs. However, no comprehensive review has examined this behaviour. This scoping review synthesises evidence on how bypassing is defined, its prevalence, determinants, and how the concept has been framed in LMIC settings.

methodsFollowing PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for peer-reviewed studies published between January 2010 and September 2024. Eligible studies reported empirical qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods findings on bypassing behaviour in PHC settings for MCH services in LMICs. We used a thematic synthesis approach to map definitions, estimate prevalence, and identify determinants and conceptualisations of bypassing behaviour.

results20 studies from 11 LMICs met the inclusion criteria. Definitions of bypassing varied considerably, particularly regarding service type, treatment of referral or complication cases, and facility level. Because of this heterogeneity, reported prevalence of bypassing ranged widely from 1.8% to 88%, and these values were not directly comparable across studies. Determinants of bypassing behaviour fell into three broad categories: (1) individual factors such as higher socioeconomic status and previous obstetric complications; (2) perceptions of service quality, including inadequate equipment and negative prior experiences; and (3) sociocultural influences shaped by community perceptions. Conceptually, bypassing was interpreted both as a reactive response to perceived weaknesses in PHC and as a proactive strategy to seek safer and higher-quality care. Several studies also framed bypassing as a systemic issue, highlighting the limited obstetric capacity and readiness of PHC facilities and the need to reconsider the role of PHC in maternal care delivery.

conclusionEvidence from this review shows that bypassing PHC facilities for MCH services is common in LMICs, especially for childbirth care. The behaviour reflects concerns about PHC quality rather than physical proximity to facilities. The substantial variability in how bypassing is defined highlights the need for conceptual clarity, including a clear distinction between voluntary bypassing and clinically indicated referrals. Strengthening both the technical and experiential quality of PHC, and clarifying its role within maternal care pathways, is essential. Clearer integration with higher-level facilities would also support more coordinated referral systems and help reposition PHC within maternal health service delivery.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityMaternal-Child Health ServicesMaternal Health ServicesPrimary Health CareDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansPregnancyResource-Limited SettingsBypassingLow- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs)Maternal HealthPrimary healthcareQuality of CareReproductive Health

Identifiers

PMID42116056
PMCPMC13343871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.