ArticleBMC health services research2026
Harmonising research data to support mental health services decision making and care planning: development of a data harmonisation platform in regional Australia.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis paper outlines the development of a new, collaborative data harmonisation initiative within the Hunter New England (HNE) region of New South Wales in Australia. The initiative aims to address the issue of fragmented population mental health data across health services, research institutions and government agencies through development of a standardised platform that facilitates sharing and harmonisation of data across diverse datasets. By enhancing the region's data integration capabilities, incorporating both new and retrospective data, the platform will support emerging collaborative research initiatives and improve decision-making efficiency and effectiveness in mental health service planning. Data harmonisation is essential for mental health research because it enables large-scale, high-quality studies that can uncover patterns, causes, and solutions that would otherwise remain hidden in fragmented datasets. Mental health conditions are highly variable in their presentation, progression, and response to treatment, making it crucial for researchers to analyse diverse data sources-spanning clinical records, epidemiological studies, social determinants, genetics, and real-world patient experiences. Furthermore, population data suggests that fewer than 50% of people experiencing mental health difficulties seek treatment. Without harmonisation, inconsistencies in data collection and classification limit the ability to compare studies, replicate findings, or generate insights that are applicable across different populations and healthcare settings. Platforms supporting harmonisation of data can be enhanced with real-time data queries and visualisation, providing a unique way to understand, monitor and address population health priorities that have national significance.
methodKey stakeholders contributed through formation of a steering committee with clinical oversight and governance, and by providing feedback during development, resulting in a preliminary prototype data dashboard, focused on mental health data. Key aims of the platform were ease and suitability for use by various end-user groups. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: The first version of the prototype dashboard is being developed in the Power BI platform, focusing on the mental health domain. It is hoped that the platform will be piloted in the next phase of our project to inform scalability and potential for broader rollout within other regional and metropolitan areas of Australia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.