ArticleInternational journal of health geographics2026
Comparison of univariate and multivariate spatial scan statistics in detecting geographic clusters of croup cases in Alberta.
Article in International journal of health geographics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCroup is a common pediatric respiratory illness primarily affecting infants and toddlers. While understanding the geographic distribution and spatial clustering of croup healthcare encounters is crucial for public health planning and resource allocation, this area remains understudied. This study aimed to identify geographic clusters of croup healthcare encounters and areas of higher healthcare demand in Alberta, Canada, and compare univariate and multivariate spatial scan statistics using emergency department (ED) visits and physician claims data.
methodsWe analyzed administrative health data for children aged ≤2 years in 70 sub-regional health authorities (sRHAs) in Alberta from 2017/18 to 2022/23. Data were aggregated by sRHA and year. Kulldorff's spatial scan statistics were used to identify croup clusters adjusted for sex distribution for each year separately. Analyses were conducted on each data source separately (univariate) and for both data sources simultaneously (multivariate).
resultsDuring the study period, there were 32,740 ED visits and 49,389 physician claims for croup, with males accounting for 63.5% and 62.2% of the encounters, respectively. Overall, 59.8% of patients with physician claims and 82.8% of ED patients (n=21,688) accessed both healthcare settings during the study period. Significant spatial clustering was consistently identified, with 1-4 clusters annually in univariate, and 2-5 clusters in multivariate analyses. Certain northern areas appeared most consistently in all years and methods. The COVID-19 pandemic year (2020/21) showed unique patterns with the highest relative risks. ED visits data demonstrated wider geographic coverage with consistent major metropolitan area involvement, while physician claims data showed frequent clustering in different metropolitan areas. Multivariate and univariate analyses showed overlapping but distinct findings, with multivariate analysis identifying two clusters where only physician claims data showed significantly higher case numbers than expected.
conclusionsSignificant geographic clustering of croup healthcare encounters exists in Alberta, with northern regions most consistently identified as areas of higher healthcare utilization. Both univariate and multivariate spatial scan statistics detected significant clusters, with multivariate analysis providing additional insights by simultaneously analyzing ED visits and physician claims data. The distinct clustering patterns between data sources indicate different healthcare utilization behaviours and demonstrate the value of multivariate approaches for comprehensive spatial epidemiological analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.