ArticleBMC medical education2026
Breastfeeding and complementary feeding knowledge scale: a validated tool for health sciences education.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study was conducted to develop a valid and reliable measurement instrument to assess the knowledge levels of health sciences students regarding breastfeeding and complementary feeding. Within this scope, the psychometric properties of the "Breastfeeding and Complementary Feeding Knowledge Scale" were also evaluated. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study was conducted with 2173 students enrolled in the Faculty of Health Sciences. Scale items were developed based on a literature review and expert opinions. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed to test construct validity. The reliability of the scale was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients. In addition, as part of criterion-related validity, correlation analyses were conducted with the Health Literacy Scale-Short Form (HLS-TR Short Form) and the Digital Healthy Diet Literacy Scale (e-HDL).
resultsThe Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value was determined as 0.621, and Bartlett's test was significant (p < 0.001). The total explained variance ratio was 27.73%. Factor loadings ranged from 0.325 to 0.847. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated as 0.768, and McDonald's omega coefficient as 0.772. The model fit indices from the Confirmatory Factor Analysis indicated an acceptable model fit (χ²/df = 5.59; GFI = 0.937; AGFI = 0.926; RMSEA = 0.046; RMR = 0.01; CFI = 0.892; TLI = 0.884). Parallel analysis supported a two-factor solution, and the factor structure was stable across split subsamples. Very weak positive correlations were observed, indicating limited practical significance despite statistical significance.
conclusionThe "Breastfeeding and Complementary Feeding Knowledge Scale" is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used to measure the knowledge levels of health sciences students regarding breastfeeding and complementary feeding. The scale is considered useful for evaluating the effectiveness of educational programs and for use in curriculum development processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.