ArticleBMC cancer2026
Involved nodal versus elective neck radiotherapy (INVERT) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective phase II randomized controlled trial protocol.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06477692 (INVERT - Prospective Phase II Randomized Trial of Involved Nodal Versus Elective Neck RadioTherapy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
INVERT - Prospective Phase II Randomized Trial of Involved Nodal Versus Elective Neck RadioTherapy
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDefinitive chemoradiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) carries significant long-term toxicities, with elective neck irradiation (ENI) serving as a major contributor to integral dose and the irradiation of critical organs-at-risk. Involved nodal radiotherapy (INRT) is a novel investigational approach that omits ENI and only treats involved and suspicious lymph nodes, holding the potential to improve short- and long-term morbidity and reduce RT-induced immunosuppression. Although single arm trials have demonstrated a low risk of elective nodal recurrences with INRT, it has never been directly compared to ENI. This study aims to compare INRT and ENI in a randomized controlled trial.
methodsThis phase II randomized controlled trial will enroll 80 patients with oropharynx, larynx and hypopharynx HNSCC (AJCC stage I-IVB, ECOG 0-2). Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either ENI (56 Gy) or INRT to the neck, along with standard radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy to the primary disease. All patients will receive 70 Gy in 35 fractions to gross disease and 63 Gy in 35 fractions to suspicious lymph nodes. For patients on the INRT arm, additional suspicious nodes will be identified by our previously validated in-house AI radiomics model and receive 56 Gy to the node(s) only. The primary endpoint is the probability of solitary elective volume recurrence at 2 years. Secondary endpoints include grade 2 + acute dermatitis, grade 3 + acute dysphagia, and MD Anderson Dysphagia Index scores at 2 years. DISCUSSION: This trial is the first randomized study comparing INRT and ENI approaches in HNSCC and will provide important information on whether INRT is non-inferior to ENI with respect to disease control.
trial registrationRegistered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06477692).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.