Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42116021›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2026

Involved nodal versus elective neck radiotherapy (INVERT) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective phase II randomized controlled trial protocol.

Sympascho Young, Dominic H Moon, Jing Wang, Liyuan Chen, Mu-Han Lin, Lin Zhu, Chul Ahn, Randall Hughes, David J Sher

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06477692 (INVERT - Prospective Phase II Randomized Trial of Involved Nodal Versus Elective Neck RadioTherapy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06477692 phase2recruitingnot on this map

INVERT - Prospective Phase II Randomized Trial of Involved Nodal Versus Elective Neck RadioTherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterRan2024 to 2028Enrolled80ConditionsHead and Neck CancerArmsENI using IMRT with or without chemotherapy, INRT, ENI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sympascho YoungDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Dominic H MoonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Jing WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Liyuan ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Mu-Han LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Lin ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Chul AhnDepartment of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Randall HughesDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
David J SherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. david.sher@UTSouthwestern.edu.

Funding

National Institute of Health (NIH), United States 1R01CA251792-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDefinitive chemoradiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) carries significant long-term toxicities, with elective neck irradiation (ENI) serving as a major contributor to integral dose and the irradiation of critical organs-at-risk. Involved nodal radiotherapy (INRT) is a novel investigational approach that omits ENI and only treats involved and suspicious lymph nodes, holding the potential to improve short- and long-term morbidity and reduce RT-induced immunosuppression. Although single arm trials have demonstrated a low risk of elective nodal recurrences with INRT, it has never been directly compared to ENI. This study aims to compare INRT and ENI in a randomized controlled trial.

methodsThis phase II randomized controlled trial will enroll 80 patients with oropharynx, larynx and hypopharynx HNSCC (AJCC stage I-IVB, ECOG 0-2). Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either ENI (56 Gy) or INRT to the neck, along with standard radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy to the primary disease. All patients will receive 70 Gy in 35 fractions to gross disease and 63 Gy in 35 fractions to suspicious lymph nodes. For patients on the INRT arm, additional suspicious nodes will be identified by our previously validated in-house AI radiomics model and receive 56 Gy to the node(s) only. The primary endpoint is the probability of solitary elective volume recurrence at 2 years. Secondary endpoints include grade 2 + acute dermatitis, grade 3 + acute dysphagia, and MD Anderson Dysphagia Index scores at 2 years. DISCUSSION: This trial is the first randomized study comparing INRT and ENI approaches in HNSCC and will provide important information on whether INRT is non-inferior to ENI with respect to disease control.

trial registrationRegistered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06477692).

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckChemoradiotherapyClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicHumansLymph NodesProspective StudiesRadiotherapy DosageRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicArtificial intelligenceElective nodal irradiationHead and neck de-escalationInvolved nodal radiotherapyRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID42116021
PMCPMC13335197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.