ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Machine learning-based prediction of diabetic retinopathy using clinlabomics: a multi-center study.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of vision loss, yet conventional retinal screening remains costly and resource-intensive. This study developed and validated machine-learning (ML) models using routine laboratory data to provide a cost-effective, accessible alternative for DR risk stratification and triage.
methodsWe analyzed data from 750 patients (363 T2DM; 387 DR) and externally validated the findings with 451 additional cases. Fifty hematological and biochemical parameters were screened. Six algorithms were trained via five-fold cross-validation, with XGBoost emerging as the top performer. Model interpretability and feature selection were conducted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and ablation analysis.
resultsThe XGBoost model achieved high discriminative performance (AUC = 0.87). Feature ablation identified a streamlined set of four key predictors-total cholesterol (TC), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), fibrinogen (FIB), and glucose (GLU)-maintaining an AUC of 0.87. External validation confirmed robustness (AUC = 0.86) with balanced sensitivity (0.73) and specificity (0.80). Decision curve analysis indicated significant clinical utility, while SHAP provided individualized prediction transparency.
conclusionsRoutine laboratory parameters effectively power ML models for DR prediction. The resulting web-based XGBoost tool offers an interpretable, accessible solution for adjunct risk scoring and early triage, particularly beneficial for prioritizing high-risk patients in community and primary-care settings where specialized retinal imaging is unavailable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.