ArticleBMC genomics2026
XtractPAV: an automated pipeline for identifying presence-absence variations across multiple genomes.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Presence-absence variations (PAVs) significantly influence phenotypic diversity across and within species by modulating functional modules associated with stress responsiveness, adaptation, and developmental processes. This modulation ultimately contributes to genetic diversity at both inter- and intra-species levels. However, existing tools available for detecting PAVs in assembled genomes possess limitations that hinder comprehensive analyses. These limitations include the absence of scalable workflows for multi-genome analysis, the imposition of stringent parameters regarding coverage, PAV length, and sequence identity, as well as the frequent necessity for manual integration. To address these challenges, we developed XtractPAV, an end-to-end pipeline that automates the extraction, annotation, and interactive visualization of PAVs across assembled genomes. XtractPAV was evaluated using assembled genomes from both eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms, including Pyrus communis, Arabidopsis thaliana, Mus musculus, and Salmonella enterica, to assess its capability to detect presence-absence variations across diverse species. The performance of XtractPAV was benchmarked against other established pipelines, demonstrating an optimized workflow that allows comprehensive extraction and annotation of PAVs. To further validate PAVs, representative XtractPAV-identified PAVs in A. thaliana and P. communis were independently confirmed using WGS paired-end read mapping, demonstrating consistent query-specific insertion and deletion signatures at predicted loci in the reference genome. Notably, the pipeline successfully identified PAVs from the reference set and also revealed novel PAV regions overlapping with genes. Furthermore, the automated report generation feature of XtractPAV produces publication-ready summaries of PAV distributions alongside diverse interactive figures. The XtractPAV webpage is available at its project page https://sherazahmadd.github.io/XtractPAV/ and its GitHub repository https://github.com/SherazAhmadd/XtractPAV .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.