ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2026
Examining the spread of nutrition-based misinformation by TikTok influencers: an experimental analysis of trust among young adults.
Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNutrition misinformation spreads rapidly on social media. Young adults particularly rely on influencers and platforms, such as TikTok, for nutrition information. This study examined young adult TikTok users' trust in nutrition information and nutrition influencers, exploring whether influencer qualifications and message accuracy influence trust.
methodsWe conducted an online experiment using Prolific and Centiment. A total of 1,035 TikTok users aged 18-26 years were recruited from four countries (USA, UK, Australia, Canada), with 1,016 included in the final analysis. Participants were randomly assigned to view one of six TikTok videos manipulating (1) influencer qualification (qualified vs neutral vs not qualified) and (2) information accuracy (accurate vs misinformation). Outcomes were self-reported trust in the influencer and trust in the message content, measured using validated multi-item scales. Differences across conditions were analysed using factorial ANCOVA models in SPSS.
resultsTrust in the influencer and trust in the message differed by qualification condition, with the highest trust observed when the influencer reported a nutrition qualification. Trust in both outcomes was also higher when the video contained accurate information compared with misinformation, with mean differences across conditions ranging from approximately 0.47 to 0.50 points on the scale. Post hoc analyses indicated lower trust in both the influencer and the message among Canadian participants relative to other countries.
conclusionsInfluencer qualifications and information accuracy independently increase young adults' trust in TikTok nutrition content. These findings support encouraging qualified nutrition professionals to prominently disclose relevant credentials, ensure accuracy in original posts, and actively counter inaccurate nutrition content shared by others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.