ReviewNeurological research and practice2026
Prevention of neuroinfectious-diseases: high impact of vaccination programs - but the potential is not maxed out yet.
Review in Neurological research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The brain health bundle: integrating evidence-based strategies to guide neurological prevention.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe greatest impact on the burden of CNS infections resulted from preventive measures, mainly vaccination programs, that have decreased the incidence of many CNS infections significantly. Here, we highlight the main cornerstones of vaccination programs on bacterial and viral CNS infections and point at future chances of upcoming vaccines. MAIN BODY: Vaccination programs have significantly decreased the number of cases due to Haemophilus influenzae type B and Neisseria meningitidis. For pneumococcal meningitis, new vaccines that prevent neuroinvasive serotypes have the potential to decrease numbers in the future. Whereas a vaccine is available for tick-borne encephalitis, prevention of neuroborreliosis is limited to contact precautions. However, vaccination rates against tick-borne encephalitis remain too low in many countries. Another neurotropic virus that can be prevented effectively by vaccination is varicella zoster virus (VZV). Interestingly, vaccination against VZV also seems to reduce the risk of dementia as recently shown. While vaccination is important in general, patients with immunosuppression benefit most from vaccinations. Finally, recent measles outbreaks impressively underline the efficacy of vaccination programs and demonstrate what can happens if vaccination rates decrease.
conclusionVaccination programs have shown to be effective in reducing the burden of CNS infections. As vaccination rates are generally still too low and as new vaccines are coming up, it is obvious that the potential of vaccines to prevent CNS infections is not maxed out yet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.