Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42115897›Full record

ArticlePest management science2026

Selecting effective nozzle-pressure combinations for successful foliar spray applications of Beauveria bassiana-based mycoinsecticide.

Roberto Beltrán-Martí, Cruz Garcerá, Patricia Chueca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pest management science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Roberto Beltrán-MartíInstituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Moncada, Spain.
Cruz GarceráInstituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Moncada, Spain.
Patricia ChuecaInstituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Moncada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9333-8083

Funding

Agencia Estatal de InvestigaciónEuropean Regional Development FundEuropean Science FoundationGeneralitat ValencianaMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHydraulic spraying is the main method for applying entomopathogenic fungi (EPF). Negative effects of nozzle and spray pressure on conidial viability have been reported, and appropriate droplet size ranges have been proposed to mitigate them. However, information integrating nozzle-pressure interactions with both physical and biological parameters to identify configurations that maximize pest-control efficacy remains limited.

resultsConventional flat-fan XR110 nozzles and hollow-cone nozzles, including conventional ATR80 and air-induction TVI80, covering a range of orifice sizes, were initially evaluated for clogging at a spray pressure of 1.0 MPa. Only small-orifice flat-fan nozzles showed clogging. Droplet size distribution of non-clogging nozzles with ISO 01 and 02 orifice sizes was assessed at spray pressures between 1.0 and 2 MPa, together with their effects on conidial spray efficiency (conidia μL

conclusionOptimizing B. bassiana applications requires balancing clogging risk, droplet and deposition characteristics, conidial viability, and biological efficacy. © 2026 Society of Chemical Industry.

Indexed as

BeauveriaBiological Control AgentsInsect ControlPest Control, BiologicalAnimalsPressureSpores, FungalBiological Control Agentsbiopesticidescloggingconidial viabilitydroplet sizeentomopathogenic fungi (EPF)hydraulic sprayer

Identifiers

PMID42115897
PMCPMC13453205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.