ArticlePest management science2026
Chitosan and salicylic acid as elicitors on pod formation in common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) and their post-harvest impact against the Mexican bean weevil Zabrotes subfasciatus.
Article in Pest management science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommon bean Phaseolus vulgaris L. (Fabales: Fabaceae) is a major source of dietary protein in Latin America. However, its productivity and postharvest quality are often limited by abiotic stresses and biotic pressures, particularly infestations by the bruchid weevil Zabrotes subfasciatus Boh. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). This study investigates the effects of foliar applications of salicylic acid (SA) and chitosan (Ch) during the pod formation stage on bean resistance to storage damage caused by Z. subfasciatus, as well as their influence on yield, bromatological composition, and secondary metabolite content.
resultsThe application of SA (1.0 mM) and Ch (1.0 and 5.0 μM) significantly enhanced the phenolic compounds of common bean seeds, increasing total flavonoids to up to 5 mg catechin equivalents/g and bound phenolic compounds to up to 40 mg gallic acid equivalents/g. Notable fold changes were observed in key compounds: gallic acid increased by 4.88- and 4.62-fold, 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid by 4.62- and 5.22-fold, and quercetin by 14- and 12-fold under 1.0 mM SA and 5.0 μM Ch treatments, respectively. Ch increased insect mortality by 23.5%. Additionally, the 1.0 mM SA and 5.0 μM Ch treatments reduced seed weight loss by 52% and 56%, decreased seed damage by 23% and 43%, and lowered insect emergence by 68% and 64%, respectively, in response to Zabrotes subfasciatus infestation. Importantly, these treatments did not affect the proximate composition of the beans, thereby preserving their nutritional quality.
conclusionOur results demonstrate that eliciting common bean plants with 1 mM SA and 5.0 μM Ch increases flavonoid and bound phenolic content, while significantly reducing Z. subfasciatus emergence, oviposition, and seed damage. © 2026 Society of Chemical Industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.