ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Effect of insoles with different cushioning properties on knee impact after radial tear of posterior horn of medial meniscus: a finite element analysis.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The posterior horns of the medial menisci are more commonly injured during exercise. Cushioning insoles are one of the most widely used conservative interventions for preventing knee joint injuries. However, the effect of the cushion property of insoles on the knee joints with meniscal tears remain unknown. We investigated the effects of insoles with different cushioning properties on the knee joint following a radial tear of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Full extension landing with a heel-first strike pattern was performed by 12 participants randomly wearing ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) and artificial cartilage foam (ACF) insoles, and the peak plantar pressures (pPP) were measured. The right knee of the participant whose pPP was closest to the median was loaded to a finite element model with radial tear. The pPP of EVA insoles (2386.42 ± 298.29 N) was higher than that of ACF (2174.16 ± 270.63 N) (t = 7.84, P < 0.001). The finite element analysis revealed that the peak von Mises Stress (pVMS) values of the medial and lateral menisci were 12.32 MPa and 7.90 MPa for injured joint with EVA, and 9.02 MPa and 6.84 MPa for injured joint with ACF. Hence, insoles with higher cushioning can decrease the vertical impact force and stress concentration of the knee joint after radial tear of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.