Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42115830›Full record

ArticlePest management science2026

Commercial permethrin elicits chemoreceptive responses on different Anopheles gambiae sensory appendages.

Sassan S Kambou, Adeline Valente, Philip Agnew, Anna Cohuet, David Carrasco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pest management science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sassan S KambouMIVEGEC, Université de Montpellier, IRD, CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Adeline ValenteMIVEGEC, Université de Montpellier, IRD, CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Philip AgnewMIVEGEC, Université de Montpellier, IRD, CNRS, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7856-8398
Anna CohuetMIVEGEC, Université de Montpellier, IRD, CNRS, Montpellier, France.
David CarrascoMIVEGEC, Université de Montpellier, IRD, CNRS, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1375-2562

Funding

Agence Nationale de la RechercheInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor malaria mosquitoes, the ability to detect pyrethroid insecticides before coming into contact with an impregnated surface can be highly advantageous in terms of fitness. Such detection may lead to the development of behavioral modifications that help them to avoid commonly used vector control tools. A previous study has shown that malaria mosquitoes can detect different pyrethroid molecules without coming into contact with them, regardless of their physiological resistance status. However, the mechanisms underlying this detection are not yet fully understood. This study aimed to identify which chemosensory appendages in Anopheles gambiae are involved in the non-contact detection of permethrin, a widely used pyrethroid in malaria control.

resultsBehavioral responses to commercial permethrin headspace were recorded in female An. gambiae, in which specific sensory appendages were either removed or coated with resin to impair their chemosensory function. Additionally, electrophysiological recordings were performed on different sensory appendages: antennae, palpi and tarsi, to characterize their electrophysiological activity after permethrin stimulation. The behavioral assays revealed that tarsi were primarily responsible for mediating mosquito takeoff responses after permethrin headspace delivery. This finding was supported by significant electrophysiological tarsal responses to the insecticide. In contrast, removal of the antennae did not alter behavioral responses, although electroantennogram recordings indicated neural activity in response to the permethrin headspace. The palps showed neither behavioral nor electrophysiological responses.

conclusionThese findings indicate that An. gambiae detects commercial permethrin in vapor form using two distinct sensory appendages: the tarsi and the antennae, but with varying behavioral output. The results suggest that the non-contact detection of the insecticide may be mediated by chemosensory signaling pathways. Nonetheless, further research is required to identify the specific sensory mechanisms involved in the detection of pyrethroids in malaria mosquitoes, and their contribution to the evolution of behavioral adaptations against pyrethroid-based vector control tools. © 2026 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Indexed as

AnophelesInsecticidesPermethrinAnimalsArthropod AntennaeBehavior, AnimalFemaleInsecticidesPermethrinantennaeinsecticide detectionmalaria mosquitopalpipyrethroidtarsi

Identifiers

PMID42115830
PMCPMC13453230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.