ReviewClinical and translational science2026
Limited Visibility and Perception of the Clinical Relevance of Clopidogrel Pharmacogenetics in Cardiology Literature.
Review in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clopidogrel is an antiplatelet agent widely utilized in cardiology. It is a prodrug activated in the liver by the cytochrome P450 isoform CYP2C19. Variability in the CYPC2C19 gene influences the activation and efficacy of clopidogrel. This is covered in guidelines from the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium, the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group, and more recently the UK Centre of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation in Pharmacogenomics. Despite this extensive guidance, pharmacogenetic information is rarely used to guide clopidogrel prescription in cardiology patients. The present study assesses the visibility of the pharmacogenetic guidelines in the cardiology literature. We analyzed citations of the clopidogrel pharmacogenetic guidelines in the cardiology literature and in the cardiology guidelines/position statements on the treatment of acute coronary syndromes and stable coronary artery disease. Citations of these guidelines were found to be limited in the cardiology literature. Only 3 out of 19 cardiology guidelines/position statements refer to the pharmacogenetic guidelines. 58% of the cardiology guidelines/position statements mention clopidogrel pharmacogenetics but suggest that the use of pre-emptive genotyping for CYP2C19 variants to guide clopidogrel prescription is of limited clinical relevance. Genetically determined variation in clopidogrel efficacy has poor visibility in the cardiology literature and clinical guidelines. It is perceived to have limited benefits for clinical practice despite mounting evidence from randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews/meta-analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.