Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42115691›Full record

ArticleNPJ Parkinson's disease2026

Driving motor cortex oscillations restores plasticity and improves bradykinesia features in Parkinson's disease.

Giulia Paparella, Davide Costa, Martina De Riggi, Luca Angelini, Daniele Birreci, Sara Pietracupa, Antonio Cannavacciuolo, Andrea Guerra, Matteo Bologna

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ Parkinson's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06297538 (Targeting the Motor Cortex in Parkinson's Disease by Gamma-transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06297538 naunknown statusnot on this map

Targeting the Motor Cortex in Parkinson's Disease by Gamma-transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation: Pathophysiological and Therapeutic Implications

TypeinterventionalSponsorNeuromed IRCCSRan2023 to 2026Enrolled84ConditionsParkinson DiseaseArmsgamma transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), sham transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giulia PaparellaIRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy.
Davide CostaIRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy.
Martina De RiggiDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Luca AngeliniIRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy.
Daniele BirreciDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sara PietracupaIRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy.
Antonio CannavacciuoloIRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy.
Andrea GuerraDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Matteo BolognaIRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy. matteo.bologna@uniroma1.it.

Funding

Call for Finalized Research 2021 GR-2021-12372323
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Parkinson's disease (PD), impaired plasticity of the primary motor cortex (M1) contributes to bradykinesia. Enhancing cortical γ oscillations through transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) restores M1 plasticity, but whether this translates into bradykinesia improvement remains unclear. We conducted a double-blind, sham-controlled study to determine whether M1 γ-tACS improves intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)-induced plasticity and alleviates bradykinesia in PD. Forty participants (20 patients and 20 healthy controls - HCs) underwent two randomized sessions: iTBS-γ tACS and iTBS-sham tACS. We assessed corticospinal excitability and GABA-A-ergic-related intracortical inhibition using transcranial magnetic stimulation, and bradykinesia features through finger-tapping kinematic analysis before and 5, 15, and 30 min after iTBS-tACS. iTBS-sham tACS failed to induce M1 plasticity in PD, whereas iTBS-γ tACS elicited M1 plasticity (p = 0.006) and improved SICI (p = 0.004). These neurophysiological changes in PD were paralleled by improvement in bradykinesia features, i.e., faster and wider movements (all ps < 0.001). No changes were observed following iTBS-sham tACS or in HCs. SICI γ-tACS-induced changes correlated with the clinical score in patients (r = 0.68, p < 0.001), and plasticity changes correlated with velocity improvement (r = 0.61, p = 0.003). γ entrainment restores M1 plasticity and GABA-A activity, alleviating bradykinesia in PD with effects persisting beyond stimulation. These findings have translational relevance and offer insights into bradykinesia pathophysiology (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06297538, registration date March 7, 2024).

Identifiers

PMID42115691
PMCPMC13478292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.