ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning prediction for menopause women with low bone mass: a multicenter and retrospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis provides an opportunity to detect and prevent fractures. This study uses machine learning (ML) techniques to enhance the predictive ability for low bone mass (LBM) risk. A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed, including 3,738 menopausal women from a hospital (the internal validation dataset) and 1,008 menopausal women from the community (the external validation dataset) between December 2014 and February 2022. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operation (LASSO) and elastic net methods are employed to screen the variables. ML algorithms and logistic regression are applied using clinical risk factors to develop a prediction model, and its effectiveness is subsequently evaluated. The optimal model is selected, and the concordance statistic is established for discrimination, comprising 11 variables. In predicting LBM, the model achieves an AUC of 0.918 in the internal validation dataset and 0.910 in the external validation dataset, with the XGboost model particularly noteworthy. This prediction model assists older women at elevated risk of osteoporosis, guiding decision-making for primary care providers to identify those needing preventive treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.