ArticleScientific reports2026
Minibeam radiation therapy does not induce canonical immunogenic cell death or cGAS-STING activation in glioblastoma and astrocyte monocultures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Minibeam Radiation Therapy (MBRT) uses sub-millimetric beams to generate highly heterogeneous dose distributions and has shown promising results in preclinical glioblastoma by preserving normal tissue while eliciting immune responses. However, the initiating molecular mechanisms remain unclear. We hypothesised that immunogenic cell death or cGAS-STING pathway activation could be involved. We evaluated cell death, damage-associated molecular patterns (calreticulin exposure and HMGB1 release), RT1a exposure, and cGAS-STING activation 24 h after irradiation. MBRT was compared with conventional radiation therapy (CRT; X-rays or protons) in glioblastoma cell lines (F98, RG2) and normal astrocytes using flow cytometry and qPCR. CRT induced dose-dependent tumour cell death, whereas MBRT caused lower, non-dose-dependent effects. Astrocytes showed similar responses to both modalities. Immunogenic markers were limited: CRT increased calreticulin and RT1a exposure more than MBRT, while HMGB1 was undetectable. No transcriptional activation of the cGAS-STING pathway was detected, although interferon-stimulated genes were partially upregulated in F98 cells. RG2 cells showed no immune activation. CRT selectively induced Cxcl10 expression in astrocytes. MBRT and CRT induce distinct biological and immune-related responses in tumour cells and astrocytes in vitro, suggesting different tumour-intrinsic mechanisms; whether these translate to broader immunogenic effects in vivo remains to be determined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.