ArticleScientific reports2026
Spatially dynamic binaural cues have a larger influence on auditory stream segregation than static cues.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Auditory scene analysis is the process used to separate and integrate acoustic information into representations of auditory objects. Spatial cues play a critical role in this process, but questions remain regarding how these cues influence auditory stream segregation. The ABA stream segregation paradigm capitalizes on a bistable stimulus capable of eliciting perception of a single (integrated) auditory stream, or two separate (segregated) auditory streams with equal probability. Here, perceptual bistability was used to assess the effectiveness of interaural level (ILD), time (ITD), and correlation (IAC) values in promoting stream segregation when kept static versus dynamically modulated, across extended ABA sequences (100 + sec). Results showed that intermediately lateralized static binaural cues (7 dB, ILD; 225 µs, ITD) minimally affected stream segregation; in contrast, systematically modulated cues did, with perceptual hysteresis-like effects. These results show that perception of movement increases the influence of binaural cues as a stimulus feature for separating sound sources more than static cues. Comparison of binaural cue segregation boundaries and traditional discrimination thresholds showed that individuals with high sensitivity to a cue (i.e., low thresholds) were more likely to have narrower segregation boundaries, indicating common cognitive processes that support spatial stream segregation and sound localization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.