ArticleScientific reports2026
Real-world use of thrombopoietic agents in treatment-naïve children with severe aplastic anemia: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) in children is a life-threatening disease. While hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the standard of care, many SAA patients lack a suitable donor. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) have emerged as adjuncts to immunosuppressive therapy (IST). The objective of this study was to report a multicenter experience of TPO-RAs use in treatment-naïve children with SAA. We included 57 children, with a median age of 7 years (range 1.2-17), who received TPO-RA monotherapy (n = 13) or TPO-RA + cyclosporine A (CsA) (n = 44). Median hemoglobin, platelet counts, and absolute neutrophilic count all increased significantly in both groups (p < 0.001). Overall, 68.4% of patients achieved remission, and none reported severe adverse events related to the TPO-RA. The rate of remission was higher in the TPO-RA monotherapy group (92.3%) vs TPO-RA + CsA (59.1%), (p = 0.074), with a shorter median time to remission (6 vs. 12 months; p = 0.025). Median observation period was 24 months (range 4-108) with no significant difference between the two treatment groups. Treatment with TPO-RA monotherapy or TPO-RA + CsA resulted in clinically meaningful hematologic responses. These findings support prospective evaluation of TPO-RAs in frontline therapy for SAA when HSCT is not readily available, potentially changing management of pediatric SAA in specific contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.